Thursday
19Nov2009

2010 CTS Sport Wagon - One Hot Wagon

2010 Cadillac CTS Sport Wagon 

Diamond White w/ Ebony Leather

3.6L V6 304 HP with 6 speed automatic transmission

The photo galleryof the CTS Sport Wagon.

As you know we took a strong interest on the CTS-V Challenge. Reviewing this CTS Sport Wagon a few weeks later is an appropriate follow up to our Challenge interest. This version of the CTS has been around for a while, and there have been numerous reviews of the CTS sedan.  

The Sport Wagon is new, with a unique street presence, its a distinctive look. Finished in Diamond White it attracts numerous second takes.

The base price starts at $50,755 this tester with the 1SH package which literally includes anything, and everything you would ever want, and expect in a car at this price segment. From the glass roof, heated ventilated seats, navigation, rear vision camera, lumbar, key less start to name a few. This particular car has a total MSRP of $60,770 when you see a Cadillac in that price range you have a tendency of pausing for a moment. 

This is "serious money" territory, is this a serious car worth the money? Its a fair question to ask, especially in light of the events that have been buffeting GM. 

Cadillac has done its due diligence with the CTS. If you could "blind fold" an individual and have this person experience this CTS, and other European offerings, in most instances the individual would not know the difference, and would even choose the CTS over some of the European offerings. 

This CTS is a good car that can play in the "European sport sedan arena" all day and not get ruffled.

How does it drive?

Like a European rear wheel drive sport sedan, with a wonderful sound from the engine (the V6 sounds like an inline 6 need we say more), seamless transmission with a good manual mode, precise steering with good on center feel, a suspension that is constantly urging you to get spirited, excellent progressive brakes. 

How does it feel?

When you are prepared to spend $60,000 for any vehicle you are looking for a "feel" its no longer just specifications, its a "feel" that a vehicle communicates to you. Yes...it does get personal, its your money, and a vehicle has to pull at your heart, and intellect. 

This car has the "feel"...it will provoke your heart in addition the street presence is awesome, the styling is unique, the performance and driving experience is superb, the interior is well styled, enriched by the wood touches. 

Why a Sport Wagon?

If you are seeking a unique car with a different look, with innovative styling this car is for you. Is it really a station wagon? From our perspective its more of a sedan with a different trunk styling, with very cool tail lights. Several manufacturers are now offering "luxury 5 door sedans" it seems to be the latest trend. From a styling/design perspective its easy to do much worse than the CTS.

We have an improved understanding of why Bob Lutz thumps his chest with this car. He is confident that it is a good car compared to the competition. There is an also AWD version which again shows that Cadillac has done its homework.

You can configure your own CTS to your personal requirements.

What would we tell Bob Lutz?

A- Bob, the front seats need attention, they are not up to the standard of the rest of the car.

B- The transmission algorithm needs a higher degree of crispness, although the manual mode is cool.

C- Bob, we discussed this one before, without a "competitive lease program for the market segment" in Canada this car faces an arduous task in the market.  

If you are considering a 5 door sedan in this price segment, you must take the time to experience the CTS Sport Wagon.

 

 

Saturday
14Nov2009

2010 LaCrosse CXS - It is a Buick

2010 Buick LaCrosse CXS

Midnight Blue Metallic w/ Cashmere Leather 

3.6L V6 280 HP at 6300 RPM and 259 lb.ft. of Torque at 4800 RPM w/ 6 Speed Automatic

The photo gallery of the LaCrosse click on a thumbnail for the slide show.

The LaCrosse has remarkable street presence, you immediately notice the car, thinking to yourself its an "elegant" car. At this point you still don't know what it is, when you discover that its a Buick. The mental connections either become positive, or negative, or even worse no connections at all. The styling of this car "connects" with many taking a second look.

The exterior styling is appealing, upholding the Buick tradition, and provenance with portholes, and sweep spear body line. The interior is stunning, the design is innovative, with good materials, excellent fit and finish. Perhaps because its not expected from GM, or a Buick the interior is a pleasant surprise, and firmly grasps your attention, and makes you feel good. Its also roomy, the rear seat legroom is immense for the size of the car.

Its clear that Buick did its due diligence, in capturing and re communicating the essence of Buick. Folks that understand Buick, many are older by now, others gave up on Buick long, and younger generations have never considered a Buick. 

Lets just say that this LaCrosse is a Buick that merits serious consideration.

This tester is well equipped with all the features that are expected of a car wanting to compete in the entry level luxury segment. Impressive Harman Kardon entertainment system, navigation, Bluetooth, heated and ventilated seats, heated steering wheel with wood trim, dual zone climate control, back up camera, touch screen, heads up display, Xenon headlamps, rear sun shade, mood lighting, Touring Package which includes variable damping and 19 inch wheels, keyless ignition with a push button start. Oh...the doors have a solid "premium sound" when closed.

How does it drive? Like a Buick should drive...quiet, and smooth!

Its a Buick distinguishing  feature...not smooth its not a Buick. Except that it keeps its composure, is very stable, you can even get spirited in on/off ramp situation. Good performance and acceleration from the direct injection 3.6L engine, the 6 speed automatic is seamless. The steering has good on center feel, while keeping in mind that its a premium sedan. 

All the safety features that you expect are present including Rear Seat Thorax airbags, in addition to all the other air bags, ABS brakes, traction control, Stabilitrak.

Buick has made a diligent effort to rediscover its heritage, its brand, its provenance, and convey the essence of Buick in a modern car ready to meet the expectations of a younger customer base that perhaps has little knowledge of Buick. 

Buick in the day was the quintessential entry level luxury car. Obvious that Buick has to regain a footing in the entry level luxury segment populated by serious, and strong competitors. The LaCrosse is a strong contender in the segment.

The fuel economy rating is 7.3L highway and 12.2L city per 100 kms.

You can configure the LaCrosse to your personal requirements. There is also an AWD CX version, the CXS is the top of the line.

The warranty is 48 month / 80,000 kms with the powertrain at 60 months / 160,000 kms.

If you are considering an entry level luxury car, take a look and a drive a LaCrosse, if nothing else it will assist you in your decision. You will discover what a Buick is all about (never thought I'd say that). 

We asked for participation from the Twitter community to review the LaCrosse. Thank You for taking the time to participate.

From @lars2885

I do remember the original ventiports (I think they were called) and the sweep spear. Portholes were appropriate to Buicks of that period. A late 50's Buick floats down the road like a yacht on a calm sea, its steering wheel seemingly disconnected from the skinny tires and its suspension set on dead ahead. 

What I think Buick's recaptured from that period is the sense of style and dash that made, and still makes, their late 50's models so desirable. The sweep of the dash into the doors, that flat cap on the instrument pod, the centre stack, the stitching on the seats all proclaim a grand impression with supporting detail. 

We know that GM can make a good chassis today. I'll be interested to hear how your time behind the wheel confirms that. Is this car front-wheel drive?

In my case this car hit a chord, it has the "essence of Buick" it looks good, its elegant, its smooth, the 6 speed automatic is as seamless as a Dynaflow. The interior is world class with any other vehicle in its price range (do I sound like Bob Lutz?). This version compared to the older versions is completely reassuring, it does not wallow, its does not have the "marshmallow" feel. Its a modern car, solid, confidence inspiring, good brakes, does not lose its composure on broken pavement. 

Yes, it is front wheel drive, the 3.6L makes good power with a bit of torque steer under hard acceleration. 

From Hagen Durant

I'm happy to see Buick make a car that has more youth in it. The LaCrosse gives me that first impression.

I share your sentiments, its a "real Buick" and its modern. It makes a compelling statement that Buick is prepared to compete for the younger customer. The LaCrosse is a premium/luxury sedan not a sport sedan.

A splash of cold water.

From @DR1665

...but I've no interest in this GM product whatsoever. I can't be of any help with that in which I do not believe.

I can understand the lack of interest, and not having your heart in this car. I have endured years of skepticism, with a touch of cynicism towards newer Buicks. This car is different, it exudes the Buick personality that was lost for countless years. Take a look at a LaCrosse you will be surprised.

By now you know that we are huge Jay Leno fans, watch Jay describe and talk about his Buick from the Fifties.

 

 

Monday
09Nov2009

2010 Camaro SS - The Real Thing

2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS - 2SS

Black with Inferno Orange/Black leather.

6.2L V8 426 HP with 6 speed TR6060 manual transmission

Take a moment to view the photo gallery, click on any photo for a slide show.

Its a Camaro, its true to its Detroit Iron DNA would you expect anything else? Finished in Black with no graphics it has a subtle, and menacing appearance.

Lets deal with some of the urban legends that envelop this car. How is the vision? It has the cool chopped top look, vision is good, you are quickly habituated to the available glass area. In the meantime it contributes to the killer street presence of the car. It has proximity sensors in the rear bumper to assist while backing.

The trunk is a Camaro trunk, historically they never had a big trunk, why should this one have a trunk, or a huge trunk opening. The rear seat, same thing, when did Camaro's or pony cars have a rear seat that could accommodate grown human beings? 

Yes the interior has some wide swaths of plastic, the Inferno Orange breaks up the "plastification" and makes it bearable. The Inferno Orange is liked by most people that viewed the car.

Now that we have dealt with the "urban legends" lets deal with the SS.

The Camaro captivates the imagination, is it the movies, the previous versions, the buzz? For some reason pony cars with the Detroit Iron feel are enduring, Camaros seem to make their way to the top of the pony car food chain. Its not a Boomer thing, or a mullet thing, its a car thing, its an enthusiast thing, its a gear head thing. If you are experiencing difficulties to understand the "essence/soul" of this car perhaps its not for you.

The LS3 is as good as it gets for a "small block" Chevrolet engine. The Tremec TR6060 is as good as it gets to having a "proper 6 speed gearbox" as Jay Leno would say, and the Brembo brakes are very good especially at higher velocities. The steering has good on center feel.

The base price of $37,085 for the 1SS version is superlative value considering the components that are included, and the "performance envelope" of the car. You could not build a 1969 "resto mod" Camaro with this level of performance at a less than a $40,000 budget.

How does it compare to a 370Z? They are both enthusiast cars, with different DNA's, that appeal to different enthusiast priorities. How these cars make you feel is subjective, all the spreadsheet comparisons will not communicate how you will feel driving, and enjoying the cars. The 370Z is a precise car with a strong cornering/track orientation, the Camaro SS is less precise with a strong power orientation. 

We have been fortunate to experience cars with sophisticated, and very serious performance parameters, what we like to call the "performance envelope". From our perspective this Camaro SS can play in the "performance sandbox" with all the established big boys. Its docile for normal street use, and ferocious when you need power. The urban legend that Detroit Iron does not turn or stop is not applicable to this Camaro SS. 

Do we have to tell you that all the safety features be it air bags, ABS brakes, brake assist, traction control, Stabilitrak are included.

You can configure a Camaro to your specifications.

Fuel economy rating for the LS3 is 13.2L city and 8.2L highway. The highway rating is probably attainable. This car at 100 KPH the engine is doing only 1,450 RPM in 6th gear, its a phenomenal highway cruiser.

Do you need a Camaro SS? Nobody needs a Camaro SS, and you can surely develop a myriad of rationalizations that you don't need one. If you are an enthusiast. If you have a craving for serious performance. If you have an affinity for V8's, and you have an appreciation for Detroit Iron.

You still don't need a Camaro SS, you WANT one!

 

We ask for participation on Twitter when we do reviews. These are the questions, and comments that we received for the Camaro SS. A huge Thank You for taking the time to participate!

From @DR1665

I would be curious to hear how the fit and finish compares with other, lesser models. My experience tells me that GM does a decent job of building vehicles like the Corvette, Camaro SS, Cadillac CTSV, Enclave, and Sierra, but demonstrate a lack of concern for build quality in the lower trim levels.

Finally, if Ford ends up offering an EcoBoost Mustang, how could that affect the market for Camaros, given the Ford's ease of modification?

Looking forward to your take on things, sir.

I usually hand wash vehicles that I review, the old school "zen experience" to take a hard look at how a vehicle is put together. This Camaro is comparable to other vehicles in its price range, is it spectacular fit and finish? No! Is it acceptable fit, and finish for the price? Absolutely.

The interior is what you would expect from a Camaro, all the pieces have a good fit, with reasonable materials. In this particular car would I want a better door panel and remove the oil cooler on the engine? NO!

Perhaps the next version of the Boss 302 / Z28 will be a V6 with a couple of turbos, Ford has the Eco Boost, and Chevrolet showed a twin turbo V6 at SEMA with the subtle hint of Z28.

From @Ormond2009

How's the comfort of the seat? Is visibility ok? How's the ride around town? Does it make you feel good driving American muscle?

The seats are comfortable with reasonable support, the cushion could be slightly longer. During the first 30 seconds the visibility is atrocious, by the 60 second mark you are used to it, by the 90 second mark its normal. The car is very docile with a good ride quality for around town driving.

Human nature, testosterone, power in cars, YES this car fulfills the requirements with gusto.

From @lars2885

So, how well does the SS fill the role of a modern muscle car? 

The original cars had power, this one stops and turns on top of having power. You feel much safer and have a tendency to get ambitious on a regular basis. On broken pavement the car is very solid, while keeping its composure. 

Does it satisfy the senses like the old one did? 

The engine intake sound is tuned (they learned from Ford), the exhaust is a subtle burble (does not attract too much attention), you hear the synchronizers in the transmission like an old Muncie M22 (Rock Crusher). The shifter has the "heavy feel" of a Hurst shifter. Its all there to satisfy the senses.

Is it fast enough to give you street cred?

The first half of the accelerator pedal is moderate and perhaps misleading, the second half is ferocious. Its a provocative adrenaline rush in the first 3 gears. Enhanced street creds would be a "hot cam" (a bit of a lopey idle), and 500 HP which is easy attain with this car. Turns off the traction control, it becomes pornographic. 

Is it the perfect car for a sunny weekend’s driving trip for two?

Absolutely, and highly recommended to regenerate the human mind, heart, intellect! In addition to being an effortless highway cruiser.

What makes it stand out? 

Its the Chevrolet version of Detroit Iron, superb small block engine in the car, with old school big block performance. All the components are present to use it in a spirited fashion.

Does it have flaws that interfere with the enjoyment? 

If you focus on enjoying the performance its an effective, and competent car. You don't really need a radio, but when you want it the Boston Acoustic sound system is there. It has XM satellite, Bluetooth, steering control. As if you have time for all that when you are slammin' gears. 

Why would I want to choose it over its two obvious competitors? 

You chose this one because you are a Chevrolet fan, and a small block aficionado. The specifications of the LS3 are impressive, similar to Teutonic hand assembled motors.

Is it really almost a Corvette for half the money?

A Corvette would be faster its a lighter car, and more precise. For half the money, a Camaro has independent suspension, same engine...different street creds...the Camaro conveys a stronger "bad boy" image than a Corvette.

Is it almost an M5 for half the money? 

The "performance envelope" of the Camaro SS is in the German performance sedan territory. 

Its easier to explore the extreme edges of the performance envelope with a German sedan, or perhaps a CTS-V, with the Camaro SS you need to willfully and unconditionally commit yourself to explore the edges of the envelope. 

Is it the best thrill for the buyer’s hard-earned but appreciating loonie?

For an enthusiast that wants to enjoy Detroit Iron with strong performance, its exceptional value. Especially by specifying a Camaro SS with a singular focus on performance. Think of this a Harley Davidson Trike starts at $ 39,659.

Is it true to its roots?

Chevrolet, Detroit, Oshawa, Apple Pie, Bailout, its very true to its roots.

From @cbaccus

I would like to know where you think the sweet spot of the transmission is? Also, fit and finish in the interior. How would you compare to say it's most direct competitor the new Mustang?

The sweet spot of the transmission is the first 3 gears, especially 2nd, by the time you shift out of 3rd you are in absolute "get in trouble territory". On the street what works well, while being stealthy is to gain good momentum in 1st, to the metal in 2nd, then its up to you how bold you want to be in 3rd. Sixth is an incredible cruising gear.

The fit and finish of the interior is good, the Inferno Orange breaks up the monotony, the plastic content is widespread. The Inferno interior has mood lighting in the door panels. For a performance coupe the interior is good and acceptable.

The Mustang is closer to the original (smaller) with better proportions, while having a solid rear axle. I would speculate that the independent suspension in the rear of the Camaro takes up a lot of room and impacts the styling of the car. The individual that prefers a Ford will get a Mustang, the individual that prefers a Chevrolet will get a Camaro. 

 

Wednesday
04Nov2009

1979 Camaro Z28 / 2010 Camaro SS

If you would try to plan, it would not work. This week is perhaps Camaro week, we have a 2010 Camaro SS that we are reviewing, SEMA is featuring numerous Camaro's, and 31 years ago this 1979 Z28 was being built in Norwood.

Must be a Camaro thing! The 2010 is from GM its our tester for the review, the 1979 is owned by "The Colonel" since it was new, its a one owner car with 30,000 original kilometers, with the "patina" of an original car.

We thought that a side by side comparison would be unique, interesting, and informative. 

     Yes...the 2010 is a bit "bigger" than the 1979

Look how wheels and tires have evolved the 2010 has 20 inch painted alloys, the 1979 has 15 inch American Racing wheel. Both have staggered wheels 20x8 and 20x9 / 15x7 and 15x8.

 

Rear 3/4 view of the 1979

 

From the Front the "bigness" of the 2010 is obvious.

From the rear.....

From the side...

 

The interior of the 1979, at the time cloth seats were preferable to vinyl, leather was not available. This is the Custom Cloth Interior. The shifter for the 4 Speed was quite obvious. Its a Momo steering wheel.

  

Interior of the 2010, notice the power seat, leather, the shifter is less obvious, and plastic technology has constantly progressed in the past 31 years. 

    

The venerable 350 cu.in. "small block" this one is an LM1. In 1979 this engine was rated at 175 HP at 4,000 RPM and 270 lb.ft. of Torque at 2,400 RPM with an 8.2:1 compression ratio. Those numbers are not exciting today, and were not exciting in 1979.

The engine looks factory stock with the except for the finned magnesium valve covers, the holes on the air cleaner cover, after many years the foam sealing the air cleaner to the hood deteriorated, its a functional hood scoop/cold air package.

The engine has an L82 camshaft, roller timing chain, stainlees steel head gaskets, high pressure oil pump, its looks factory original and performs better than factory stock. The engine performs up to 5,500 RPM compared to the low 4,000 RPM when it came from the factory. Makes an appreciable difference in the performance of the car. In addition to what would be called a "cat back" exhaust system today. This car is louder, and raspier than the 2010.

Have you noticed....there is no Air Conditioning!

 

  

This is the LS3, still a small block rated at 426 HP at 5,900 RPM with 420 lb.ft. of Torque at 4,200 RPM with a 10.7:1 compression ratio. This engine is all aluminum, roller camshaft, roller rockers, heads that flow a ton of air. Perhaps its the ultimate "small block".  

  

Same as many years ago, you can put a "hot cam" from GM in this engine to raise the power. The specifications make a small block Chevy "aficionado" drool. Do we have to tell you that this car is much faster than the 1979. 

Some tidbits to consider.

  • The 1979 has a 4 Speed with a 1st gear ratio of 2.64:1 and a rear axle ratio of 3.73 for a total reduction of 9.85....yes its got a positraction. 240 lb.ft. of Torque
  • The 2010 has a 6 speed with a 1st gear ratio of 3.01:1 and a rear axle ratio of 3.45 for a total reduction of 10.4...its got a positraction. 420 lb.ft. of torque.
  • As they say you do the math.
  • The 4 speed in the 1979 is comparable to 4th in the 2010, the 2010 is a superb highway cruiser compared to the older car.
  • The 1979 has discs in front, drums in the rear, the 2010 has Brembos...need we say more as to which car stops better.
  • The 1979 has a solid rear axle with leaf springs, the 2010 has an independent rear axle with coil springs....there is no comparison.
  • The 1979 is a wonderful nostalgia car with technology similar to a 1969, in reality what technology, there are hardly any electronics, still a carburator, the 1979 was on the waning days of "old school" before the application of technology/electronics.
  • The 2010 is a 1969 or a 1979 with the application of technology, electronics, and the normal evolution of 40 years or 30 years.
  • The 1979 was good value and resonable performance for the day. It was and still is a fun car that is very enjoyable.
  • The 2010 is good value with an exceptional performance envelope, that is fun and satisfying.
  • The 1979 has no safety features except for seat belts, side beams in the doors, collapsing steering column.
  • The 2010 is bristling with the latest safety features, air bags, ABS brakes, brakes assist, traction control, stability program.
  • On a good run the 2010 works the rear tires/suspension harder and longer (up to 4th) than the 1979 (up to 3rd).
  • The feel of the clutch is similar although the 1979 is mechanical (linkage) the 2010 is hydraulic, the feel of the clutch is close too.
  • Tremec / Borg Warner almost the same with the exception that one is a 4 speed the other a 6 speed, you hear the synchronizer the shifter/shift linkage feel is again similar.
  • The engine in the 1979 revs up quickly, and pulls strong to 5,500 RPM it tapers off after 5,500.
  • The engine in the 2010 revs up instantly, and pulls very strong to 6,000 RPM.

Have the reasons or rationale for acquiring a Camaro with a level of performance changed?  Not at all, human nature is still the same.

 

Monday
12Oct2009

2010 Kia Forte - The Koup de Koup

2010 Kia Forte Koup 2.4L SX

Racing Red with Black Leather

2.4L 4 cyl 173 HP with 6 speed manual transmission

The Koup photo gallery and slide show.

The Koup is an appealing car, with the right styling elements and cues, especially in Racing Red with the black details in the front and rear bumper. The car looks good, often attracts a second glance with an inquisitive "what is it look?".

Its an understatement to say that the Forte line, Koup and Sedan have great styling and design, with a strong street presence, especially for compact cars. Although styling is personal, the majority find these cars "good looking"...we do too!

This tester is the top of the line SX version which starts at $21,495. the only available option is the automatic transmission. Its strong value which is one of Kia's distinguishing brand attributes.

The leather seats with the contrasting red stitching are pleasant. The same stitching continues on the leather wrapped steering...a nice touch. The fit and finish is excellent for the price point, the heated seats are included in the SX package.

This version even has automatic climate control, by now you know that we are strong proponents of automatic climate control with its set it and forget it convenience.

As usual all the safety features that you expect are present, be it ABS, Traction Control, Electronic Stability, in addition to 6 air bags.

The sound system is good with 6 speakers, CD, Sirius satellite, Bluetooth, and MP3 connectivity. By now most folks have their favorite satellite radio channels, especially that many listen to satellite radio on their computers. Needless to say, satellite radio is expected in a car.

A red coupe, with all the styling cues, including a diffuser in the rear bumper, 17 inch wheels, 300 mm front discs, a manual transmission, sport pedals, left foot rest. Yes...you need to see what it can do. Keeping in mind the price point, and its a FWD car with a torsion rear axle, the car is impressive, you are often saying to yourself "I'm doing this in a Kia!".

The steering has good on centre feel, the brakes are very good, the shifter is good for a FWD application, the suspension is a little hard but good within the limits of a torsion rear axle. You can get spirited with the car, especially if you stay within the 2 to 4th gear range on a tight windy road, the car is a lot of fun, and easy to downshift or upshift when you are busy with steering, brakes, picking an apex, powering out.

Did we forget to mention...the engine has a pleasing  sound, performs well in the upper ranges, could use a bit more torque at lower RPM's. Easily turns on the traction control, and generates some torque steer if you get very spirited.

Both this Koup, and the Sedan are great highway cruisers doing 120 kph at 2,500 RPM.

The fuel economy ratings are 6.2L highway and 9.2L per 100 kms city.

The Dare to Compare for the Koup.

The features and specifications, are impressive. By now you know the 5-5-5 warranty.

You can configure the Koup here, at this time the lease rate for 36 months is 3.9% with a very realistic 44% residual.

For the price point its a remarkable car.

Are you considering a compact coupe? Make it a point to experience the Koup, it has good performance, exceptional features, cool styling, and strong value.