Photo Gallery
Powered by Squarespace

Disruption or What

Back in the day disruption was referred to as "rocking the boat" was not wise to rock the boat.

At the same time a disruptive individual was known as a "shit disturber" and again it was not wise to be a shit disturber.

Some of this stuff would quickly alter a career path, or what looked like a career path back in the day.

Bureaucracy was presumably prevalent all over the place, again back in the day. While today in an open, transparent, system there is perhaps more bureaucracy going around from a PC to a laptop, to a mobile device, and so on...reflect on this for a moment.

What are we getting to? have to be your own disrupter, and shit disturber.

"Disrupt yourself before someone comes along and disrupts you".

You surely know the saying "Control you destiny or someone else will"

Connect a few dots for yourself, and as we progress towards the end of 2016, and start looking at the 2017 landscape. Be keenly aware of what can disrupt you, who will disturb your shit, and how you will if not outright control at least influence your destiny.

The bureaucracy...its all over the place we all know that...or do we?

We agree its a tall order, not simple or easy.




The Purpose Of Work Is To Create

Fascinating and thought provoking talk by Peter Adeney...its time well spent.

“If you can get yourself financially independent, not only does it give you the power to eliminate most of the bullshit in life, but it frees your life’s work to become more truthful.”




The Crazy Ones

You know the saying...a photo is worth a gazillion words.


The commercial...



The Future Belongs To The BOLD

Through the years we have always prompted our readers to be unique, remarkable, disruptive, connect dots, and in your way to be BOLD.

Back in the day...way back in the day. You stepped up to the plate, made a decision, owned the decision, enjoyed the win, or endured the consequences. Today folks take out Powerpoints, tables, spreadsheets, torture data to create a multi faceted buffer replacing stepping up to the plate.

A white paper from Deloitte that resonates with what we have been saying for years.




Gutless...and More

The other day we read an interesting article in the Globe and Mail; that resonated with us Corporate Canada has a courage defecit-and its costing us.

“Far too many Canadian companies lack the courage necessary to make bold decisions in the face of uncertainty and risk,” concludes the report being released Monday. “They shy away from making key investments and executing dynamic strategies, unwilling to accept short-term challenge for the long-term opportunity. As a result, they – and Canada’s economy – remain in low gear.”

Another snippet...from Canadian Business.

In August 2012, former Bank of Canada governor Mark Carneyderided Corporate Canada for sitting on a large pile of “dead money.” In effect, Carney called out the country’s business leaders as a bunch of wimps.

As you know we have been saying for years that its CMS (Citizen Main Street) that is powering the Canadian economy. Agreed...CMS is enabled by Canadian financial institutions.

We have also been saying that many Canadian companies are sitting on mountains of cash.

While CMS has the GUTS to invest in the Canadian economy, many Canadian companies are GUTLESS when it comes to investing.

In the meantime auto sales in Canada powered by CMS are through the roof.

While Unifor has to strong arm GM, and possibly the other manufacturers to invest money in Canada, and more important remain in Canada.

Reflect on this for a moment...

Do you get the feeling that CMS and Corporate Canada are moving in different directions? If you do, we agree with you.




How Economic Inequality Harms Societies

A TED talk by Richard Wilkinson from a few years ago that still resonates today.



What Is Your Tolerance For Poor Service?

Have you ever asked yourself how much poor service you are willing to put up with, before you run out of patience, and understanding, or both.

We probably all have our own tolerance factor for poor service, or what we perceive and understand as poor service literally in any situation.

How often do you balance the money is not worth the aggravations...sort of its not enough money to start getting aggravated. If I complain it will alter the context of this business meal.

How often does it become "intellectually insulting" and its not a case of money anymore. Now its really aggravating. Especially when you explain a situation, and its as if you explained it to yourself.

How often do service providers push the envelope to provide borderline acceptable service, value or both.

Have you seen the myriad of surveys, ratings, and so on that are constantly floating around on the various platforms. "Your opinion is important to us, how did........".

Yes...there are a gazillion different situations that can generate a gazillion examples.

Factor in dynamic pricing, and it becomes even more interesting.

How often do you simply let it go, the price was too high, the food was miserable, the value proposition did not make sense, someone or something tried to take advantage of you...and the list could keep on going, and going.

What products, establishments, companies, restaurants to name a few do you have on your personal "avoid list" and do not recommend to your friends? Agreed we are all individuals, we have different and varied expectations, and tolerances.

If you have a business how often do you push the envelope to save money, while sending the wrong message to your employees that interface with customers. "We are committed to superior quality/service, we have a great location, lets fry more chicken/fish/potatoes in the same oil to save money or time." Where is the customer in this decision?

You have to wonder why folks don't resort to social media to voice their dissapointment about a service. We suggest that you do...Twitter is the ideal platform to communicate your displeasure.

As more products are commoditised, with increasing competition and parity. Agreed price becomes a factor, but service/customer experience will ensure ongoing loyalty. Reflect on this for a moment.

Bringing it closer to the auto business.

They are all good vehicles, with comparable features, warranties, prices, incentives, and so on. Surely you see where this vector is going. What makes the enduring difference?





Is It Heavy Enough?

You have to wonder. In an age of advancing technology why are vehicles so heavy?

When vehicles had frames, thicker sheet metal, and there were no plastics. It was almost expected that vehicles were heavy, not very efficient, used a ton of gas.

Today we have all sorts of technology, its not body on frame, its unit body (a big shell), its not thick sheet metal, its high strength steel here and there, its a ton of plastics, its aluminum, in some cases its even carbon fiber.

Its still heavy....go figure.

Must be the safety equipment?

Must be the ever increasing technology content?

Its combination of a "ton" of factors, save weight here, ad weight there, and the end result is not much lighter.

Ford engineers an aluminum F150 which saves weight, while the end result is not that much lighter, and the competition embarks on a mission to prove that steel is better/stronger than aluminum.

You would expect vehicles to be lighter, more efficient, than they are.

Although they are safer, have more features, higher technology content, are on the cusp of driving themselves.





Save My "You Know What"

Have you ever noticed how much imagination and energy is consumed in the process of a last instant effort to presumably avert a deep yogurt situation?

Its fascinating in a context of presumed transparency what humans will resort to, invent, verbalise, to come out of a yogurt situation. Invariably it becomes a game of taking care of #1, mine before yours, lets see how I can come out ahead of this yogurt situation.

Human Nature

Its a constant that in some ways human nature does not change, the primal instinct to save your bacon is alive and well in 2016. Its adapted to modern realities, the presumed transparency, and the ensuing scheming veiled in transparency.


Especially in a business environment, when the shit hits the fan, its duck and immediately head for cover. Invariably in the same business environment, someone has aspirations of being ahead, while someone else is obviously left behind.


All the talk of teams here, there, and all over the place. Its a cohesive team when its all going gang busters. The moment a yogurt situation appears, the team becomes a prop to saving a bacon here, and hanging another bacon much for transparency, let alone integrity.

Someone comes out ahead, while another takes a shot.


Take a moment...

As you take it a little easier during the Dog Days of Summer, reflect on what folks do to save their bacon in a transparent environment, empowered by technology.

Also reflect on the individual in the back of the room observing the human behavior, and scheming.





The Montreal Olympic Games

With all the noise of the upcoming Rio Olympics.

Suddenly 40 years ago there were summer Games in Montreal, in Canada.

Fascinating to see the perspective of folks 40 years later, and yes Montrealers paid for a long time.

From way back in the day with Montreal coming out of Expo 67, it was only normal to host Olympics games a few years later in 1976.

Agreed...the Olympic Stadium that subsequently took years to complete, made a statement back then for a multitude of reasons. While building the stadium was an ongoing saga for a few years prior, and several years later to complete the tower.

The retractable roof...don't go there.

The games were the event of the year in Montreal, securing tickets for any venue at face value was an accomplishment.

GM was the official vehicle supplier to COJO, and there was nothing more Canadian than a Pontiac Parisienne at the time, and probably assembled in Ste.Therese. Obvious that Parisiennes were the car of choice used by COJO.

Imagine for a moment if the Internet and social media existed back then.

The Olympic Village is still there.

Following the Munich Olympics of 1972, the games in Montreal were perhaps a prescient glimpse into the security for any major event on the world stage that attracts millions of eyeballs. The Olympic Village was fenced in during the games guarded by the Canadian Military. The food for the athletes was at a central location under guard.

Yes...time passes for was 40 years ago.